WernerD
Second Officer
Flight distance : 350837 ft
Offline
|
Did not know that. In that case it is a very bad architecture in my opinion. Are you sure about that? Including the antenna, hddownlink etc??
The only logical modules would be
* aircraft with all sensors, flight controller, remote control receiver, video downlink
* Gimbal with camera
Where to put the SD Card/SSD is a open. Camera makes sense but if it is too heavy, the drone might make sense as well. But that impact just the camera connector, does it have the pins for the camera data stream or not.
With such a design you can attach the camera to any bird capable of lifting it. Have a Osmo handheld gimbal etc.
In reality some of that had been implemented that way, but the I2 breaks the compatibility. And even the Osmo's X3 camera cannot be used on the inspire as I read it.
And such a modular design would make sense. You want to use the same camera for aerials and for handheld. For aerials you might want to use different cameras depending on the use case, an X3 for longer flight times and broad daylight, a Z3 in case the zoom is important, an X5 when the image quality has to be stellar or it is dark.
It is bad enough that you have to buy the accessories again, remotes, battery, charger, ... but we are used to that already.
For me it looks as if DJI tried that but then broke the design in a few areas and hence broke the modularity. If by accident, for technical reasons, or for marketing reasons - I don't know.
I personally don't think this will maximize the profit of DJI. Who will buy a new drone, a new camera, a new osmo with its camera,...? And compare that to how many people would stick to their X5 camera and upgrade the drone. Or stick to the I1 for the current year but upgrade the camera. And would these upgrade-buyers not end up with a complete I2 at the very end? So you do not lose a single buyer but win all the upgrade willing people.
|
|