QuanthonyTrang
Second Officer
Flight distance : 419980 ft
Australia
Offline
|
Heavysledz Posted at 2017-3-8 12:40
So I am pretty sure I know the answer already but wanted to hear what your thoughts are about ND filters for still photos vs video. Do you really want to use an ND filter and slow the shutter speed down so slow that any moving object (i.e. car, animal, person running etc...) will end up as a blur on the screen?
That is correct.
But in saying that, ND filters are NOT that important unless you are trying to achieve what many call the 24fps cinematic footage (motion blurring). The mavic's gimbal is so stabilised that jello is no longer present. To many untrained eyes, many dont know the difference. Only use ND filters if you have some sort of idea as you may degrade your video by using the incorrect filter.
So back on topic.. in manual mode at 24fps, you want to use 2x the shutter speed which is 1/50th shutter speeds (or there abouts). The exposure should sit around -0.7 to 0. Remember - if over exposed, then you will lose details and cant be corrected in post. You can use the zebra overexposure feature to assist with choosing the right ND filter for the correct lighting conditions.
The only time you should be using ND filters for photos is to create a sense of time in stills. Eg, motion in waterfalls and waves or foggy skies above the clouds..
|
|