BuzzCut
lvl.4
United States
Offline
|
Psy Posted at 2017-2-2 19:54
Thanks for the sentiment, but I would like to make a small counter argument.
My test was for range, not for battery life. In terms of range test, my test was a huge success - I got up to 4KM which I was more than happy with, because my Mavic did not have the same range manuafacure defect that my brothers P4 suffered. It did not even occur to me that I had to worry about the battery life, because in other environments and flights RTH estimations were extremely accurate. This is what this thread is really about right now
For the sake of learning and us all losing as few Mavics as possible I think there's still a little left on the table here... Apologies for the essay.
You make a great point. I don't know what your 'test' was. I presumed to know but I clearly guessed incorrectly.
So, I infer from your response that your test was for 'range, not for battery life' and that it was a 'huge success' that your test was purely for RF transmission range and was therefore something like:
A) Can I fly my Mavic on this day in this place and in these conditions and maintain RF signal, including video transmission, for a distance of 4KM?
In that case it was indeed a success. You proved to yourself that that Mavic on that day, in that place, at that flying height, and in those RF conditions could do that (I'll get to all the caveats in a bit - they're important).
That's a very expensive test though, since it doesn't factor in the ability to travel out and then travel back again (both RF signal and battery). I would argue there would have been a much less expensive way to approximate that test by simply turning on your Mavic and leaving it hovering above a field with someone watching it while you got in a car with the controller and drove to different distances and periodically got out and tested signal that way. Using that method you also would have been able to keep going til you found you max RF trasmission distance (again, with all of the previous caveats)
The more typical range test I've seen is:
B) Can I fly the mavic out X far and get it back again? This is RC and battery, throttled by the weakest link. Ususally that's done incrementally until someone feels like they've gotten close to what they consider to be a maximum without losing the drone (or they go one step farther and lose it). This is still a risky 'range test' but definitely a much less risky type of range test than the one you performed. I want to point that out to anyone that's looking to get their bird safely back. I'm not trying to be facetious here. I think it's important to distinguish the two and highlight the risks if we're trying to get our Mavics home at the end of the day.
Now, the most important point in my opinion which needs to be understood if we're to fly our drones for fun and still get them back:
DJI can estimate how far the Mavic can go, but they cannot guarantee how far it will go. Never confuse an extimate with a guarantee when it comes to RC.
Why? RC range depends on RF conditions. RF conditions not only vary significantly from place-to-place, but vary significantly in the same place for a whole myriad of reasons. To take it to an extreme, you could prove that 'your' Mavic in 'your' chosen location could go 4KM on a given day with the given RF conditions. You could test the same Mavic in the same place on a different day and get completely different results, maybe resulting in losing your bird. Why? Tranmission distance depends on RF conditions, and a drone manufacturer only has control over the frequency, transmit power, receive power etc. of the craft and controller. It cannot guess or control all the other RF signals in the area, the atmosphere (e.g. moisture in the air), the temperature, radiation from the sun, the tilt you have your antennae at vs. where the bird is, etc. No control at all. All of these factors and more go together to determine whether you have good RF conditions. Again, estimates; not guarantees.
The same goes for battery life (though that wasn't part of your test it did have an effect on your day). The Mavic uses sensors to estimare how much usable battery power is remaining, and an algorithm to churn that with sime limited other variables (how fast you're going, motor RPM, who knows what...) to estimate (again just a guess) how long that charge will last you. That algorithm doesn't know future variables such as whether you're going to speed up, change flying modes, fly higher, or whatever. Further the algorithm that tries to estimate whether - based on the current distance between the controller and the craft - you need to start heading back can't know future wind direction or speed, or the previous things that might happen to change the speed that the battery will be drained. Other things can afftect the battery as well, such as temperature changes affecting the conductivity of the materials.
Bottom line: if you see a video where someone tells you 'The mavic will travel X far' or 'The Mavic's battery will last Y long' in such blanket statements they are being simplistic and innaccurate.
Since I don't walk around with a drive test team with spectrum analyzers I cannot gauge current RF conditions and therefore wouldn't consider performing a range test. Line of sight is my personal choice for a limit for multiple reasons that are personal to me.
|
|