Joolse
New
France
Offline
|
Charles Adams Posted at 2017-8-18 07:29
"ActiveTrack" has worked well for me (though it will lose subject if you switch from video to pics or visa versa, this is apparently a design feature).
I understand the mechanical differences between "follow me" (gps) and "active track" (subject recognition). But what are the practical differences? I've done both (follow me with P3S), and I haven't experienced a behavioral difference. Just a different way to implement. Are there any practical differences that I've missed?
I have been using the Spark for a few days only, so my experience is very limited. But while I am pretty happy and excited about the Spark's features in general, I found the "ActiveTrack" to be a bit disappointing. It's okay to track a slow moving object staying withing a small range, like a kid playing in a garden. But for anything moving "faster" or in a wider range, I found the Spark would lose track too quickly: it wouldn't track me for more than a few seconds when I would just walk fast or run in a large and open field.
Maybe it's just my limited experience, but I found the Mavic's Follow Me much more reliable from start than the Spark's ActiveTrack.
Will keep trying using it though... |
|