OneMatt
 lvl.3
Flight distance : 155984 ft
Canada
Offline
|
Charles Adams Posted at 2017-8-14 10:48
OneMatt, do you have the exact response from DJI when they first refused coverage? I'm curious as to the initial justification.
I can understand that they would not cover the damage to the automobile, but I don't understand how they wouldn't cover repairs to the drone itself. That seems to fall well within the terms and conditions of the care package. Obviously they gave it a second review and decided to cover it. I'm just confused as to how they would come to the initial conclusion that the damage wasn't covered.
Initial justification was as follows:
"Unable to locate any crash on available flights. User claimed crashing into a moving car, which is not covered by warranty. Non warranty."
After escalating via a contact I had made at DJI (who I wont name, because this is outside his pervue), I was contacted by a person in warranty, who was told I was disputing the outcome. He told me the above, that crashing it into a car isnt their problem. Which, on its face, is true. But this means they didnt fully read my incident description, nor did they look at the aircraft logs.
Key here: AIRCRAFT LOGS. Not App logs.
DJI always wants to see the app logs, just as some helpful users here do, as it is a quick and dirty way to see what is happening. However, when you fly in gesture-only mode, there will never be an app log, nor a record of that flight. So, my guess is that they looked at my most recent flight record, saw it was fine, and assumed it was broken by misuse.
Looking at the aircraft log tells a different story, as detailed above.
I explained this to the warranty guy, who finally seemed to understand that this was a fly away, proven by the fact the aircraft shows that it was in disconnected mode, and it flew to a distance well beyond what it should, at a speed beyond what it should (log actually says excess speed). The log cuts off abruptly and does not show a crash, per se, as the battery popped off, so the last second or so wasnt recorded (it seems the data logger writes at specific intervals in order to prevent corrupting the log).
Anyway, he said he would call me back, but instead I got an updated invoice today, saying
"Status change to warranty coverage per flight data analyst".
I guess they finally saw I was right. For this I am glad, as there should be a better failsafe in gesture only mode (like killing the motors before it flies away).
Oh, the lower frame costs $13usd, and costs 1 hour of labour at $65usd to fix.
|
|