fansa84fe8a4
lvl.4
United States
Offline
|
Skyris Posted at 2017-11-5 14:58
I thought most of the processing was done inside the inspire now, wouldn't that make it a gimbal with sensor and lens mount??
I feel the lenses are extremely expensive, if they can deliver super sharp images at 100% crop I would still consider the upgrade from the x5s
Interesting point.
I never thought about the Cinecore processing being in the I2 itself along with the expensive licenses, and the SSD cards that are about two to three times that of what I paid for my computer's SSD cards that replaced my hard drives too. You're right that is is just the sensor along with the gimbal which is priced far above what it should be, given that a lot of the electronics and extras are in the I2 itself and not contained in one cinema camera body as other makers sell. Sort of expensive for a Super 35mm or cheaper APS-C/H camera for only a 4MP gain too. If it were twice that megapixel count, I'd understand, but not with the current abundance of 24MP APS-C/H sized sensors.
Most prime lenses of the APS-C format and even full 35mm format average around $300-$700 for the f/2.8 variety. Given they will only fit the X7 and likely no one else will make them, I'd also say they are overpriced by two fold at least. Far more variety with the X5 series with the micro four-thirds mounts.
I'd guess the actual cost runs about 20% of the retail price to make it, plus another 55% for company, and 25% for retailer. No doubt the X7 could have sold for $1,999 which would be $600 more than the X5S camera alone and might tempt some into the X7 seeing the $100 difference, less the proprietary f/2.8 lenses which might be better off half of what they currently ask for too. As it is, it is way over-priced, imho, given much of the processing is already owned within the I2 itself, along with the expensive licenses and over-priced SSD cards too.
I'll wait to see what the reviews say, and maybe there will be some sales soon too for those interested.
|
|