Arcicorsa
lvl.4
Flight distance : 235892 ft
Czechia
Offline
|
massipos Posted at 2017-12-11 08:53
Maybe it can be just a commercial choice: sure dji developers ar not incompetent, but they follow manager orders. You want to fly further than 300m, well you have to buy Mavic or Inspire plane.
Mavic and Inspire they have been sold for more than an year, if dji manager want, they could have use same transmission tecnology inside the Spark. Mavic's transmission tecnology work great at far distance and it seems that don't break EU law. What else could be the reason, to take a choice, that is due to dissatisfaction among customer?
Spark i'ts just a selfie plane, sure an expensive selfie plane, and for this is advertised.
To some extent, I agree with you. The theory is clear, Dji opened Pandora's box and did not think about the consequences of his actions (drop in sales of other products). However, this is not a problem of customers. Dji should face this!
I am interested in the product specification as a customer. If I read that Spark in the EU will fly up to 500m it's OK if it does. Unfortunately, this is not true because more than half of the people in the EU are unable to achieve of this distance, and nothing changes that the law says clearly VLOS (in my country this is controversial, it is possible to use the so-called Spotter which will follow and optically follow the quad, then I can fly like 10Km and I do not break the law) .. So even this Dji can not argue. Spark specifications are clearly given on Dji's website, but the reality is different. This is the problem.
Dji should follow one of two remedies for this situation:
1. Customize product specifications to match the situation we now have and offer customers money-back because they were fooled by false advertising
2. Repair the shortcomings so that the quad corresponds to the specifications of the Dji
I will also use this message to ask the moderators again: What will you do about it? Your silence is striking and clearly shows your attitude to the problem.. |
|