fans8b64c1e1
lvl.1
Flight distance : 4751 ft
Australia
Offline
|
Hello,
I recieved my drone on the 2nd January having bought it online in Australia Dec 28. On reciept I set to work setting it up. This sort of thing is pretty straight forward being a cinematographer by profession and having worked in the business for 25 years. After opening the camera controls I found my first issue, the slider selection auto to manual was locked and wouldn't allow me to change anything. I also found that the camera wouldnt tilt with input from the controller. I couldn't record and when I atempted to format the included SD card it said there wasn't one present...also after a card substitution. After a good day of off and on online chat, the updating of firmware, software and generally messing around (as I knew most of these were a stretch) I successfully claimed a warranty return. Now, as I was keen to be up and flying early in the work year, I was also flying...without video of course...and on dusk a tree touch happened with a low impact low altitude crash.
I came clean with the crash offering to pay for the damage caused by the crash but still expecting the addessing of my software/hardware issue. I fealt safe in letting DJI know:
1. I like to think I am honest
2. I wanted to differentiate the crash from an issue that was present with the delivered drone.
The answer from the DJI centre was unexpected and infuriuating. The issue, I'm assuming with the camera is likely to be one of processor and logic in the system. The answer from DJI was:
"We are sad that a crash happened before you have sent it for the repairs of the gimbal. However, we do regret that with that unfortunate event, it should be repaired for the crash issue now and not the original one since it would be difficult for the repair technician now to confirm the issue is a manufacturing defect or the result of the crash. If the incident proves a pilot error causing the damage, then it falls under non-warranty and you have to pay the cost for the parts and the service."
If I was to take one of my broadcast cameras or associated gear into a tech I would have a sensible discussion that balanced both sides of the equation...this seams like a shirk.
All I want to know is that when I send back the drone, offering to pay for the damage (one prop arm is off and the body damaged (camera etc untouched)...that they will warrant the original issue considering the unrelated nature of both...somethig a face to face with a tech would solve as I'm not trying to educate a call centre person with a script and little knowledge of the technical side.
Has anyone experienced this? Any ideas how to cut through to someone who may understand my issue?
|
|