15matjan
Second Officer
Flight distance : 1158258 ft
Spain
Offline
|
veletron Posted at 2018-3-20 14:18
Aye, 10W is too low, but this is for backpacking, cycle touring and kayaking, and there are limits to how much solar I could carry. Wont cost me much to try it anyway, and I can add another panel if no-good.
updating also #5:
Finally I managed to charge the powerbank in less than 8 hours with a 40W portable and foldable solar pannel which it is not as bad I thought for a moment.
This stands for 2 to 3 Air batteries to be charged, and, with a couple of powerbanks I could get almost full autonomy in the wild.
To end my post in a more optimistic way, have to admit that Air have a more energetically efficient system battery as compared to Mavic Pro Platinum and P4P+ and being surpassed only by its smaller brother, the Spark. If we think at energy which, on wild, can be supplied via powerbanks and solar pannels, a Spark battery with 16.87Wh and 16 minutes fly time means for every minute one has the Spark on air, it needs 1.05 watts of energy. In fact it will draw more as, a fraction of energy is lost when charging the batteries, etc., but, to ease the comparison will consider a 100% charging efficiency (energy transfer).
Mavic air with 21 minutes flight time and 27.43 Wh will require 1.3 Watts for every minute on air, while Mavic Pro Platinum uses 1,45 Watts (30 minutes for a batttery of 43,6Wh).
Finally, it comes P4P with 2.97 Watts per minute of flying (89.2 Wh for 30 minutes flight) which justifies why I think I'll love more my Air on my future jungle expeditions.
|
|