Mark The Droner
First Officer
Flight distance : 2917 ft
United States
Offline
|
I think 2.4 ghz signals are more apt to be absorbed by nature (trees, grass, bushes, etc.) whereas 5.8 ghz is more apt to bounce off streets, buildings, roofs - tiny water droplets in the air - even clouds - which may or may not be advantageous - depending. I think a 5.8 signal has certain favorable attributes depending on the environment - even with no signal crowding interference. But my understanding is that, all things being equal, and in a perfect and clean open environment, 2.4 ghz has somewhat of an advantage over 5.8 ghz in regards to range. I think that's why DJI chose 2.4 ghz for control of their first Phantom. I think that's why 2.4 ghz is the default freq for home routers in the USA. I think that's why DJI chose 5.8 ghz for control in the FC40, AND their P2 Vision series drones AND their P3 wifi drones - to leave 2.4 ghz available for the significantly more complex video & telemetry wifi signal. I think that's why 2.4 ghz is the frequency used for the P3 Lightbridge series and other DJI models. I think if you're using a directional antenna, it would be easier to aim a 2.4 ghz signal. I think the 2.4 ghz band is crowded in urban America and other countries which may be a good reason to go to 5.8 if you're in the city or dense suburbs. But it could be advantageous to use 5.8 in rural areas too, depending on the specific situation and/or environment. In summary, in most cases I'd start with 2.4, and go to 5.8 if I had a good reason. MHO |
|