While using the DJI Osmo Mobile II, it's very easy to review and copy the file created because it uses a regular file naming system: DJI_YYYYMMDD_HHMMSS, for JPG or MP4. It's pretty simple, pretty straightforward. But, using the new Osmo Pocket, the new system is quite confusing (example): "org_video_6553630_1545347794000.MP4" for a video created on 20181220 @18:45 hrs. What is that??? Today, I created several videos for a school concert using both devices and in the attach you will see the differences on the files created and for the Osmo Pocket it's really confusing to manage the files. Why you decide on having this convention?

Please, return to a more simple way of naming the files...

By the way, this is when you plug your phone in and within the DJI Mimo App you select to import the videos to the phone...

Noticed this too. The 65536 in the number is a VERY strong hint it's a bug. 65536 is 2^16 and is an overflow for unsigned long int (16 bit integer), sort of a magic binary number like 32768, 1024 or 1048576

Hi, we do appreciate your feedback with our new Osmo Pocket. We will forward your suggestion to our R&D department for consideration. Thank you for continued support.

Thanks for the suggestion mate!

BTW welcome to the forum Mega69!

jacksonnai Posted at 2018-12-21 20:06
BTW welcome to the forum Mega69!

This thread is from 2018: Is that resolved in 2019?

urielp Posted at 10-4 00:07
This thread is from 2018: Is that resolved in 2019?

Yes, I think so