nixuspix
Second Officer
Flight distance : 2864974 ft
Latvia
Offline
|
davidmartingraf Posted at 1-15 01:48
I think the chute is a good idea, and see them in the future acting as airbags for drones, likely to reduce the drone's impact to its colliding object. But airbags are really to prevent crashes during high altitude, hard too prevent damage from drones horizontally travelling and crashing. Drones that drop from the sky surely will benefit from having an airbag lessen the fall, and for that reason I generally believe the proper way to fly a drone is from flying higher altitudes rather than flying lower. The margin of error is reduced flying higher than lower, even though the law recommends flying no higher than 400 feet. I personally feel my drone is safest travelling at altitudes of no less than 200 feet up. You ever notice that standing on the ground you can notice your drone flying up 200-400 feet up, but think about this do you usually really ever notice bird traffic flying at altitudes that high as well? My Mavic Pro and Spark are certainly the same, if not smaller in size, than most birds the large size needed for a bird to disturb a Mavic Pro flying, or other DJI drones, high up in the air. I usually really ever notice these larger birds flying around 50-100 feet in the air, so I rarely really ever notice such birds flying 200-400 feet in the air, but I'm not saying these birds don't fly that high, I'm just saying I notice them mostly flying lower rather than higher.
Have to agree with You, David |
|