walttheartist
lvl.4
Flight distance : 46696 ft
Canada
Offline
|
The new Canadian Aviation Regulations take effect in June, 2019. Pilots of RPAS (Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems 250 g up to and including 25 kg, operating within Visual Line-of-Sight (VLOS)) must have at least a Basic pilot's license to fly in unrestricted Canadian air space. That just about covers any drone that's worth flying. Aircraft that are exempt include those below 250g (Micro Drones - no license) and over 25kg (heavy duty commercial craft - special advanced license).
Urban areas like Oshawa, Ontario (my city) have passed regulations that prohibit flying within 9 k of any airport, sport stadium etc. Given that many of these restricted areas overlap, leaves very limited air space to fly in unless we travel to the countryside. I thought I might buy an Air or Spark to replace my Mavic 2 Pro, but I see that their weights are just above the Canadian limits as well.
I believe that many countries will be constraining drone flying, with similar, stringent limitations as that of Canada's, in the near future. I think this knee-jerk response was given impetus by the brain dead idiots in Gatwick, London, who seem to have caught the what-if imagination of many Air Administrators in various countries. Many of the concerns seem to be centred around Fly-Away craft that have landed in airports and other public places. Here's a challenge to DJI. Would you consider making a drone that falls below the 250g limit, with a quality 3 gimbal camera, and all the advanced Return-To-Home and other safety features of the Mavic 2?
However Air Regulators aren't fools and would probably incorporate the smaller sizes into the restricted category. What we really need is a craft that has similar accident mitigating features as autonomous driven cars. However I'll settle for a drone under 250 g with a good camera.
|
|