DJI Factory Tour showing the production of the DJI Mavic 2


I hope they do this for it's replacement.  

That's an old one I think .
I remember it.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 00:38
That's an old one I think .
I remember it.

I think so,   I hope they make a M3 version of this.

DAFlys Posted at 11-3 01:39
I think so,   I hope they make a M3 version of this.

That would be cool indeed.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 03:12
That would be cool indeed.

But still you would find it ugly.

DAFlys Posted at 11-3 04:16
But still you would find it ugly.

I think I will get over it.
It is the price I'm more worried about.
Heard the M3P will be > € 2100,-

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 04:30
I think I will get over it.
It is the price I'm more worried about.
Heard the M3P will be > € 2100,-

Yes. Ive seen a couple of prices 2100 - 2500 for the base model.

DAFlys Posted at 11-3 04:34
Yes. Ive seen a couple of prices 2100 - 2500 for the base model.

Plus add the FMC......

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 04:49
Plus add the FMC......

It certainly appears to have gone up a lot in price.  

DAFlys Posted at 11-3 04:53
It certainly appears to have gone up a lot in price.

Different targeted market I guess.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 04:56
Different targeted market I guess.

I’ve heard a few reviews saying the Cine replaces the phantom line up so maybe.

I want to go there

DAFlys Posted at 11-3 06:50
I’ve heard a few reviews saying the Cine replaces the phantom line up so maybe.

That was my thought too

scubaAnn Posted at 11-3 08:00
I want to go there

Ive been to a few auto manufacture plants over the years and they were fascinating.   This self flying QA check though blows me away.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 08:44
That was my thought too

If it had a rolling/mechanical shutter I could see it,  but Im not sure.

DAFlys Posted at 11-3 09:06
Ive been to a few auto manufacture plants over the years and they were fascinating.   This self flying QA check though blows me away.

Absolutely!  Technology amazes me everyday.

DAFlys Posted at 11-3 09:11
If it had a rolling/mechanical shutter I could see it,  but Im not sure.

I'm not sure what the fuzz is about a rolling shutter.
Is that really better?

Wow, that is quite the manufacturing process.    Like you, I'd love to see a video of the M3 factory line.  

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 11:13
I'm not sure what the fuzz is about a rolling shutter.
Is that really better?

The cheap cameras have a rolling shutter, perhaps you mean a global shutter?

Geebax Posted at 11-3 13:33
The cheap cameras have a rolling shutter, perhaps you mean a global shutter?

That is what I mean indeed.

scubaAnn Posted at 11-3 10:41
Absolutely!  Technology amazes me everyday.

Its my favourite thing too.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 11:13
I'm not sure what the fuzz is about a rolling shutter.
Is that really better?

The examples you see are usually the difference in filming something rotating like a propellor blade,  and then there is a real difference but for the stuff we film I doubt it makes much difference.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-3 11:13
I'm not sure what the fuzz is about a rolling shutter.
Is that really better?

Heres an example

DowntownRDB Posted at 11-3 12:57
Wow, that is quite the manufacturing process.    Like you, I'd love to see a video of the M3 factory line.

I thought it was great too.

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 00:23
The examples you see are usually the difference in filming something rotating like a propellor blade,  and then there is a real difference but for the stuff we film I doubt it makes much difference.

I always thought that was caused by the readout of the sensor.
If they do it 'too slow' it will give this effect.

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 00:25
Heres an example

[view_image]

Yes, this is (to my best knowledge) caused by how they read the sensor.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-4 00:55
I always thought that was caused by the readout of the sensor.
If they do it 'too slow' it will give this effect.

Yes,  its splitting the sensor up into say 4 corners and reading them in circle.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-4 00:56
Yes, this is (to my best knowledge) caused by how they read the sensor.

Yes exactly.   

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 00:22
Its my favourite thing too.

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 01:07
Yes,  its splitting the sensor up into say 4 corners and reading them in circle.

So that is the same term then?
Or is there more difference between a mechanical one and a global one.
Wait, I will look it up
Mr GoogleFlys

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 01:08
Yes exactly.

Fjieuw. Still not complete mental.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-4 11:37
So that is the same term then?
Or is there more difference between a mechanical one and a global one.
Wait, I will look it up  

Global reads all.  Rolling does it in stages.  

Montfrooij Posted at 11-4 11:38
Fjieuw. Still not complete mental.

Fjieuw?????

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 11:44
Global reads all.  Rolling does it in stages.

Ah, so that's it.
I though it was mechanical vs electric or something, but that is different.

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 11:44
Fjieuw?????

That's phonetically.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-4 11:44
Ah, so that's it.
I though it was mechanical vs electric or something, but that is different.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-4 11:45
That's phonetically.

Nope. Still not with you.

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 11:55
Nope. Still not with you.

It is a sound you make when you are relieved.

Montfrooij Posted at 11-4 11:56
It is a sound you make when you are relieved.

Oh. We’d say.   Arhhh….  Or phew.

DAFlys Posted at 11-4 12:12
Oh. We’d say.   Arhhh….  Or phew.

It's the second one, only the Dutch phonetical thing .