bubo_bubo
 lvl.4
United Kingdom
Offline
|
GB44 Posted at 2015-8-11 00:28
Bubo,
I use Final Cut Pro just review your video, tag as many points as you wish during the video ...
Thanks GB44, I'm in debate over Final Cut Pro and others as I'm on a PC rather than Mac. But could be willing to flip to Mac just for this process in due course.
Do you think doing your extract way is onerous or well worth it for the results? Doesn't sound too bad just tagging pics.
People need a different level of results and will gain varying degrees of satisfaction, which is cool but I'm hoping for a bit better than I've seen so far.
I would like to provide
- 3-d imagery
- Convert the imagery to CAD for adaptations by architects
- Make 3-d models of existing buildings
- Once drawings adapted for any refurb or alterations, then make a 3-d model of the proposed
I can't see that happening at the minute with the results people are getting since they are having sections of facades missing and I need to show building features like gables, parapets, projections etc etc
But maybe I'm only seeing people's initial try's, not sure.
Or maybe people havnt undertaken as many photos I envisage taking (100's / 1000's) for correct results that need, hence video query as an additional smart way to achieve.
How good are your results with the video stills?
Do you think I could achieve what I'm looking for or need to implement some other processes to it? |
|