The Saint
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16993/169934cf22ad90ebe6b6bb9aec389ea401f5f1f8" alt="" First Officer
Flight distance : 6260171 ft
United States
Offline
|
I think I already pointed this out but it's worth repeating:
At Adorama, you have the RC page and it says here under Overview: https://www.buydig.com/shop/prod ... -Air-2S-Drones-Gray
DJI RC adopts OcuSync HD video transmission technology. When connected to other compatible drone models, DJI RC will switch to the corresponding video transmission technology. With different aircraft hardware, the corresponding video transmission specifications are as follows: DJI Mini 3 Pro: O3 | DJI Mavic 3 Classic: O3+ | DJI Mavic 3: O3+ | DJI Mavic 3 Cine: O3+ | DJI Air 2S: O3
Along comes the RC2 and if I don't know much about drones, I would copy the same thing from RC to RC2 and add Air 3 to the list since that is what it works with, so it ends up saying the same thing but since they created a different type page from the RC:
With different aircraft hardware, the corresponding video transmission specifications are as follows:
DJI Air 3: O4
DJI Mini 3 Pro: O3
DJI Mavic 3: O3+
DJI Mavic 3 Cine: O3+
DJI Mavic 3 Classic: O3+
DJI Air 2S: O3
The DJI RC 2 video transmission technology will automatically switch to the video transmission specifications used by that drone’s technology, and the video transmission distance will also change accordingly.
If you work at Adorama, there's no way you believe RC2 doesn't work with all the drones that RC works with plus the new drones they launch. It is easy to believe the new drone (Air 3) doesn't work back to the RC which is why you don't go back and update the RC listing. And, after reading the RC listing which talks about "switching technologies" because there is a mix of O3 drones on the list, it makes sense that this "switching" carries over into RC2 because why would you need to do any "switching" if it's just one drone in O4?
So, they made a mistake in copying the verbiage from the RC to the RC2, not because it's incorrect but because it's not yet applicable. We don't know if/when this can happen and I certainly wouldn't want to anticipate it because of what someone prints on a website; I'd rather go by technology cues and have a discussion around capabilities rather than what an intern might have done on a website. Ultimately I believe it might happen because it only make sense. And to explain a piece that seems to be discussed alot, when you see "switching technologies" that clearly is DJI speak and DJI wrote it and it shows up on a ton of their drones, I personally believe DJI meant it to refers to 2.4 and 5.8 and the public incorrectly refers it to O3, O3+, O4. Why? Because the DJI RC says the same thing about "switching technologies" so do we expect RC to be upgraded in the future to be compatible with Air 3/O4? My point: Using the term "switching technologies" is not a direct indicator that the hardware is capable of being upgraded to work across occusync. If you look at the B&H (more professional) page, you see they leave open to some degree the compatibility page which either means they don't know enough or don't yet have the final verdict. Bottom line, I believe Adorama jumped the gun.
This is what DJI says on the RC2 page: The next-gen DJI O4 video transmission technology supports 2.4GHz, 5.1GHz, [1] and 5.8GHz frequency bands,
|
|