fansbc613884
lvl.1
Flight distance : 3852293 ft
New Zealand
Offline
|
djiuser_SUilMk3Qjz42, from all that I have read above, my comments below:
The RAW v JPG argument doesn't really stack up, and the image quality differences you are seeing are simple to explain with the sensor sizes below:
Mavic 3E = 20MP 4/3inch sensor (1.333inch sensor size and TRUE 20MP)
Mavic 3T = 12MP 1/2inch sensor (0.5inch sensor size and claimed to be 48MP only because it has a Quad Bayer filter, but NOT a true 48MP)
Mini 3 Pro = 12MP 1/1.3inch sensor (0.769inch sensor size and claimed to be 48MP only because it has a Quad Bayer filter, but also NOT a true 48MP)
As you can see, of the 3 x drone sensors above, the M3T is the smallest in actual physical sensor size... as such, worse pixel resolution that the M3E or even the Mini 3 Pro.
I suggest sensor size be prioritised for your next purchase to meet your needs. Matrice 300 with H20T would be a good bet. (Forget the Matrice 30T... its got no better sensors than the M3T and it's only real advantage is it''s IP rating.)
As for the M3T SAR function... it's a miniature power house, but certainly will NOT keep up with a FLIR... just try strapping the weight of your FLIR camera under a Mavic 3 and see how well it lasts...
I like the analogy used by CloudVisual about battery drills... I would like a sand dune capable 4x4 that can go around a race track at the pace of a Ferrari, but, alas... there is no such machine... it's a constant trade off, and... How do you expect DJI to squeeze a 4/3 or even 1 inch sensor into a housing that has a zoom and thermal camera in there too...
I'd suggest you get happy with the amazing versatility of the M3T or drop $35k+ on an M300. |
|