Kyokushin
Second Officer
Flight distance : 296381 ft
Poland
Offline
|
gcvisel, and what? If someone hit an airplaine then he will get a death sentence or long jail. Similar situation if you hit a bus at Your bike, and bus driver will hit the trees or a river with all pasengers onboard.
These things are called a freedom of choice, responsibility and inevitable consequences.
Geofence will NOT prevent unresponsible people to do unresponsible things, because an unresponsible people WILL authorise HIS actions and DO unresponsible thing.
Of course he should be WARNED, and everyone should be warned about potentially dangerous air zone, but THERE IS NO difference self authorisation with DJI and a checkbox 'yes, i want fly'
In both cases a person can do unresponsible thing, and you cannot prevent it. If he will be locked in DJI hardware then he get other brand hardware and he DO this unresponsible thing.
Self-authorisation is only for collecting data, tracking people finding scapegoats and for witchhunting. This could break a rule of presumption of innocence. Nothing else.
Waring zone and map + chechbox? YES, i will sign on that with all hands, legs and other.
Self authorisation in a foreing country server? NO.
There is also another thing - a transfer of power of deciding from a user and government to manufacturer. User could be responsible, government will authorise flight and then manufacturer can just simply do NOT unlock the device, because will be locked by default.
China may fall, DJI may falland world my fall and DJI user will have a locked device. Again. There is no law, in my country and in Your countries what could require authorisation method what DJI want to introduce.
Everyone can understand some limitations in a real dangerous areas like airports, nuclear facilities, military bases, white house, but NOT cities, personal NFZ's, temporary areas or other air zones, because this is also regulated by a local law and UAV operator in the most cases are aware of that.
Unresponsible people are a promile of users, and DJI should not put everyone in Geofence chain only because there a few of them could be unresponsible. This is again, breaking a presumption of innocence.
Cars are more dangerous, knives are more dangerous, but nobody is authorising usage of a knife to make sandwitch or unlocking a car to get to work. And there is a lot unresponsible people on roads.
|
|