gbwalker
lvl.2
United States
Offline
|
The voluntary safety limit was established in 1986 via an FAA Safety Bulletin that you correctly identify as “voluntary”. But that was 29 years ago. Prior to that, I don’t recall any mention of a limit, voluntary or otherwise, to any form of RC flying. I don’t agree with your assessment of a law that establishes a 400’ ceiling as being OK. If that law were applied to all RC activities (which would likely happen) it would be catastrophic. A lot of RC activities including pattern, glider and jets exceed that by necessity and have been doing it for as long as each has been in existence. A 400’ restriction in the vicinity of an airport is understandable but I think should be at the discretion/agreement of the club and ATC facility or airport operator. I think I heard that nearly 40% of all AMA RC clubs are within 5 miles of an airport. And I don’t think that a restriction that applied to any location other than an AMA club site would be OK. AMA insurance covers pilots wherever it is not against the law or prohibited by the property owner. Many RC activities take place in parks, open farm fields, schools and include activities that exceed 400’ (gliders and others). I think we need to be very careful in agreeing with any law that “doesn’t affect me” kind of attitude. This hobby has been in existence far before quads and FPV started and broad-brushed laws are not needed. Also, as a side note, I believe that the AMA has identified only four fatal RC related accidents and only one of those was a bystander. |
|