Labroides
Core User of DJI
Flight distance : 9991457 ft
Australia
Offline
|
Suren Posted at 4-28 14:02
you can recall when the Mavic 3 first came out, they had round lens, the newer iterations launched a few months later had oval lens. Many have compared those two and said that the oval was much sharper and clearer. There are many threads that were around at that time with many arguments till we all ended up posting the pictures of our Mavic 3 cameras that showed the different lens. Dji never published that they had made a change and on paper it was listed as the same camera but field tests proved other wise. In this same instance when compared to the Pro, on paper its the same but by my own experience, having owned both drones at the same time till I sold 1, the Pro main camera was better and that is how I know this.
you can recall when the Mavic 3 first came out, they had round lens, the newer iterations launched a few months later had oval lens. Many have compared those two and said that the oval was much sharper and clearer.
And many also said there was no difference other thna the change on the housing shape.
But forums like this are full of uninformed people convincing each other of things that aren't true.
Dji never published that they had made a change and on paper it was listed as the same camera but field tests proved other wise.
Field tests?
By Forum Freddy or a credible authority?
In this same instance when compared to the Pro, on paper its the same but by my own experience, having owned both drones at the same time till I sold 1, the Pro main camera was better and that is how I know this.
I don't believe your feelings are any kind of proof.
I've also owned both and used them extensively for professional work.
I get very good results from both and don't believe that there has been any change in the main cameras.
|
|