TCPSBxVG66Gy
lvl.1
United States
Offline
|
I don't feel I ignored anything, you may have missed where I stated that the rangers should take on the responsibility of controlling drone use as it is ultimately a "newer" form of technology which by all means would enhance the promotion and awareness of our parks? Let me ask you this, do we have "beer" police to check every camper/attendant and all of their belongings in the park? Do we have "animal" police tell if people are feeding wildlife or encroaching upon marked off habitat or "collecting" police tell if firewood is being taken illegally or if people are keeping items found withing the parks as keepsakes? My entire point is that the rangers handle these situations, probably based upon reports given to them and drones should be no different. National parks and State parks are both, as you say, "set aside", based on their beauty right? You do realize that it's federal and state tax dollars that pay for their maintenance, upkeep and those which care for it right? So yes, we all are already paying for it. There is no need to create a "drone police department" just add in an hour or two to "ranger school" that covers drone legislation. Really not sure where the disconnect is here? Not only that but just because you commune with nature in one way does not mean that I do so in the same way. You are arguing a point of opinion here, which again, I understand but do not agree with. Lets not forget the fact that it is completely legal to fly into most of these parks already so long as you don't land or take off from within them, what sense does that make? |
|