What now? Why can't they be more positive about drone technology and talk more about the great things that can be achieved like how they have been used in Nepal to assess the damages : http://www.theguardian.com/techn ... -drones-a-good-name



">Attack of the Drones??

http://www.nbcchicago.com/video/ ... sday-10pm/302244471

All to sell ad space.....
The press blows !

Awesome picture of the Eagle in that Guardian piece though!

Well what else can they fill the screens up with. Certainly not any truths. I feel I've let myself down even clicking on their rubbish.

They "The Media" CREATE new controversies so they can report them as truths!!!!!!  Too many reporters, too many news channels!!!!!!  It's ALL BS now, say anything, about anything, and everybody believes it's the truth, just have to say it on TV.

Negative publicity can be countered by posting comments on the news websites.  Everyone loves "dirty laundry" so why not share the stuff that sells..I get it but agreed it gives our passion a bad name.  Post positive or constructive comments on NBC website then.  Don't know if it'll do any good but a voice of many certainly outweighs a few.

There are certain groups who would like to make it impossible to use aerial camera platforms, period. I am seeing much more negative than positive publicity regarding this.