Everything I've seen so far looks significantly worse than shot on my Mini 3 Pro (D-Cinelike, 10 bit, Sharpness/NR -2/-2, using my own Luts), oversharpened with mushy textures and ghosting.
Wondering if it would make any sense to upgrade from my M3P at all.

I have requested few youtubers hope they will share some footage in next few days.

Take a look here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fO4PEgZ1pB0&t=919s

Wiz33 Posted at 9-25 16:21
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXJgPk_8YW4&ab_channel=FlytPath

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxLq8i2Qnvc&t=74s&ab_channel=PotatoJet

Saw both these videos yesterday. Nothing that looks nearly as good as what I can achieve with the Mini 3 Pro.

Oversharpened video with way too much noise reduction.
Even the video posted by Slashcam with sharpness set to -2 looked awfully artificial.

55Media Posted at 9-26 02:19
Saw both these videos yesterday. Nothing that looks nearly as good as what I can achieve with the Mini 3 Pro.

Oversharpened video with way too much noise reduction.

You won't need a Mini 4 as your happy with the Mini 3 pro. Keep enjoying, happy flying.

When you say the Mini 4 Pro video you’ve seen so far is worse than your Mini 3 Pro have you looked at video off an SD card or on YouTube?  If YouTube, why would you expect to see high quality video with all the compression that is going on? I suggest you reserve judgement until you have compared actual raw video footage from both drones

55Media Posted at 9-26 02:19
Saw both these videos yesterday. Nothing that looks nearly as good as what I can achieve with the Mini 3 Pro.

Oversharpened video with way too much noise reduction.

I am not an expert in this field, but what I have seen seems overdrawn to me, and a real comparison for me would be rather that I can compare the photo and film result with the real situation - There I can judge the color fastness and the contrasts, if they really match well

Steph Jant Posted at 9-27 04:15
When you say the Mini 4 Pro video you’ve seen so far is worse than your Mini 3 Pro have you looked at video off an SD card or on YouTube?  If YouTube, why would you expect to see high quality video with all the compression that is going on? I suggest you reserve judgement until you have compared actual raw video footage from both drones

Youtube compression doesn't create sharpening and ghosting artefacts.
May still buy the drone soon and do my own comparison.

At least shadows seem to contain way more chroma detail which was completely lost on the Mini 3 Pro. Wondering if D-Log M can also fix the abysmal skin tones I had with the Mini 3 Pro in D-Cinelike. I have been trying to create a Lut for it for the past 12 months and still cannot figure out how to fix it.

He used -2/-2 for sharpness and noise reduction, the results look really good. No oversharpening nor smearing visible.

55Media Posted at 9-28 12:05
He used -2/-2 for sharpness and noise reduction, the results look really good. No oversharpening nor smearing visible.

I like the complexity of this video but picture quality is not always convincing for me

What interests me at the moment: Is the connection really so much better and more stable ?

I mean all these lovers of over 2km flights I see with skepticism because it involves many risks

I just saw this nighttime video on youtube.  Even with the youtube compression, this looks pretty good.

I am not suggesting for a minute that the experimental video footage I have taken with my Mini 4 Pro is "decent", but I thought I would share what I have uploaded to Google Drive.  If it helps you great, if not nothing lost.  Note that the footage taken at night is with the Mini 4 Pro static on a bench in our village square.  I didnt have time to fly and film at the same time
Sample Video – Mini 4 Pro

Thanks for sharing... Please visit my site: freecapcut.com/capcut-mod-apk/

Well thought and amazing description. please check it out: modcapcutapk.com/capcut-for-ios/