werner.daehn
Second Officer
Flight distance : 350837 ft
Austria
Offline
|
I don't want to argue with the experts and 60fps is best for sure but...... for me this looks like a mismatch in frame rates between raw footage and editing tool.
To cut a long story short: What is the fps setting of the raw material (30fps you said), the fps of the rendered movie clip and your monitor's refresh rate?
Details:
Imagine you have a very fast movement, say the copter films to the left and the church is passing by with 180 pixel per second.
The smoothest movement you will get with higher frame rates, say 60fps, then in each frame it moves just 3 pixel.
With 30fps it is 6 pixel already.
So there is no doubt.
But now imagine you take the e.g 30 fps raw material into your editor and its rendering engine is set to 24fps. It has to adjust the stream now by dropping every 5th frame. As a result your image will move 4 times by 6 pixel and then jump by 12 pixel once, then the next 4 by 6 pixel.....
01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (24fps frame number)
01-02-03-04-06-07-08-09-11-12-13-14-16-17-18-19-21-22-23-24-26-27-28-29 (30fps frame number used)
Usually the eye is lacy and does not recognice that but obviously is is not a smooth movement. With 60fps and short jumps due to frame rate adjustments, the human eye is not able to catch up. But with 24fps it is.
The same happens again, this time with the monitor the 24fps are now upsampled to the monitors or TVs frame rate. The TV can adjust to the frame rates of 24fps, 30fps,... the computer monitor is locked at 60fps nowadays. Check the computer's monitor settings. If it truly is 60fps, then this upsampling has enough reserve and won't bother you. But playing your 24fps rendered material on a 30fps monitor will get you in uneven movements again.And play the same move file on your TV for comparison.
(That is one of the few advantages of interlaced video setting)
I for example use 4k with 30fps, render it with 30fps and my monitor has 60fps. When playing it with the windows mediaplayer, it still looks awful. But with another player it is perfect.
And when checking every single frame in the raw material, each frame is perfect, no blurry image. Actually it looks like a photo.
|
|