A lot of people on here say that 1080p is surprisingly good, but when I tried it out for myself it wasn't sharp AT ALL and looked like it was taken by some 720p toy. Maybe because I was at high altitude (400 feet) and there was too many details? I would really like to try out 96 fps without losing so much quality.
Most of us prefer the higher resolution that 2.7/4K rates give you, unfortunately, anything over 30 fps at 1080 comes at the cost of degraded video quality.
I’ve noticed a big difference recording 1080p @ 60p between the original Mavic and my new Mavic Platinum. I thought this was due to recent FW updates between owning both but clearly not.
A CW Posted at 2018-1-16 23:35
I’ve noticed a big difference recording 1080p @ 60p between the original Mavic and my new Mavic Platinum. I thought this was due to recent FW updates between owning both but clearly not.
We performed cameratests on a test picture in 1080p with different Mavic Pro's in a German speaking Mavicforum: 1080p @ 30 @ 60 and @ 96fps.
The Mavics were from different Manufacturers date. Result: From Mavic Production Date 01/2017 there is no antialiasing or binning up to 60fps with only one exception.
So it seems that DJI has made Changes to the camera since 01/2017.
fly safe
When you shoot at 1080P 96fps, it will generate a slow-motion video. And for your case, do you mean that the video from the SD card looks terrible? If yes, please try to upload a sample from SD card to Dropbox so I can check. Thank you.