JPW1
lvl.2
Flight distance : 53323 ft
United States
Offline
|
JPW1 Posted at 10-29 19:39
Thanks for that explanation. I do see your point. Honestly, I'm not sure how much I ever used SINGLE focus because I may have assumed you always wanted CONTINUOUS focus. I just did some tests and could see what you were pointing to albeit the focus was pretty poor close-up (or at least for me) and it didn't feel as though I was in the 20 cm range yet. If SINGLE focus is setting the focus to infinity it really feels like DJI should call that out somewhere or maybe SINGLE focus is just a poor way of describing it because it certainly never sunk in for me and doesn't seem to be for others as well.
I do need to do more testing though to be fully convinced this focuses in the same way an action cam does. Basically, here is an example of what I would normally think the Osmo Pocket is incapable of (start around 2:15):
After some more testing, I still see the need for an INFINITY mode (if it is even possible to provide a quality option on the Osmo Pocket). You can do this test yourself and see the problem on any Osmo Pocket. Just walk around and flip the camera toward you as so many YouTube content creators do. Now, as you walk around set the focus mode to SINGLE then get some footage. Then get similar footage, but change the focus mode to CONTINUOUS.
Now, go back to the computer and compare each. Here is what I see. SINGLE focus looks awful for the individual, but the background looks good. With my arm outstretched I'm easily beyond the 20cm range, but it still looks out of focus in the foreground. Now, look at the footage with CONTINUOUS focus. The opposite is seen. The individual looks razor sharp, but the background looks blurry and out of focus as you would expect.
You can't get everything in focus as you would hope and as action cams do so well. Again, you can check Tamera's footage above as she walk around with the Action 4. Both her face and the background are razor sharp. It isn't possible with the Osmo Pocket and it should be.
This might beg the question, "Well, why not just get an action cam then?" This is because action cams do a poor job with stabilization in low light. The mechanical stabilization is really the way to go, but I can't see myself buying another one when you can't have both the individual and the background in focus at the same time. I hope they do add something that might make it possible. |
|